ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] - Proposed formula edit

  • To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams'" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Alain Berranger'" <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] - Proposed formula edit
  • From: "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:13:12 +0100

I agree with you Eric. I support the replacement of IDN by underserved
languages.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Directeur exécutif
Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet
Phone : + 216 70 825 231
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax     : + 216 70 825 231
------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Eric
Brunner-Williams
Envoyé : mardi 26 avril 2011 16:44
À : Alain Berranger
Cc : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] - Proposed formula edit


Alain,

I'm glad to see your proposal here on the mailing list as I wasn't 
sure that I understood you during the call, as we were jumping back 
and forth from the language or script question to other eligibility 
subjects, and some subjects that were neither language nor other 
eligibility.

> "... AND EITHER 3.4 (require IDN support) OR 3.5 (be from a lesser
developed country)."

Per today's call, where there was consensus to use "language" rather 
than "script", I suggest that the phrase "require IDN support" be 
replaced by the phrase "support an under-served language".

Eric





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy