RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: On "bundling" (was: comment on the Andruff Bundling Letter)

[<tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>]

Agree 100%

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Envoyé : jeudi 2 juin 2011 21:57
À : amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc : tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx; SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: On "bundling" (was: comment on the
Andruff Bundling Letter)

Andrew,

I'm aware of your concerns, as we've discussed the subject off of the JAS
mailing list. 

These and similar concerns can be expressed as exceptions to some general
rule(s) not yet developed.

The general rule(s) will either exclude Versign, Afilias, NeuStar and
others, because the rule(s) is (are) designed to distinguish between the
interest of language preservation and the interest of market capture, or the
general
rule(s) won't exclude Versign, Afilias, NeuStar and others, because the
rule(s) is (are) designed not to distinguish between the interest of
language preservation and the interest of market capture.

The problem, which is not that of the JAS WG, as the Board made that
decision in the text of Resolution 20, but to others who are concerned with
the issue of cost and opportunity of language diversity using the DNS and
registries as mechanisims to advance preservation or recover goals, is to
choose one or the other of these mutually exclusive rule(s).

Eric

-----
Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message.
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 10.0.1375 / Base de données virale: 1511/3675 - Date: 02/06/2011