Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not so at all. Chartering orgs must approve that it is treated as a 
position of that org. But interim reports are regularly out for 
comments of various sorts.
Alan

At 07/06/2011 03:37 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> I was under the impression that the chartering orgs must act to a) 
> accept or b) reject the report before it is submitted to the wider 
> world.   So the holdup in this instant case led to the doors of the GNSO.
> Given all that we know, I will accept the sure advice and proceed accordingly.
>
> Best,
> CAS
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Karla Valente 
> <<mailto:karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> Please note the Milestone Report 2 has not yet been posted for 
> public comment. Previous work from the JAS WG has been posted for 
> public comment.
> Please let me know how would you like to proceed.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Karla Valente
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Direct:  <tel:%2B%201%20310%20301%203878>+ 1 310 301 3878
>
> Mobile:  <tel:%2B1%20310%20936%204639>+1 310 936 4639
>
> Skype: kdlvalente