ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?
  • From: Rafik <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:32:02 +0900

Hello,

Agreeing with Alan and Jeff regarding the perception of the approval by GNSO 
council for sending the report for public comment, we can wait two days and 
publish the report for comment in due diligence just after gnso council call 
and approval, in meantime Karla can prepare the announcement etc ( I think that 
even the translated versions of the report are ready too). 

Best,

Rafik



Le 8 Jun 2011 à 08:34, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> All,
> 
> I know I am only an observer, but can I ask that you wait until after the 
> gnso meeting just 2 days from now. I have a feeling we will approve it being 
> published for comment and it would certainly ease some of the heartburn some 
> in the gnso are having.
> 
> So as a favor, may I request holding off for just 2 days.
> 
> Thanks. 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
> Vice President, Law & Policy 
> NeuStar, Inc. 
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
>  
> From: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 07:25 PM
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> Cc: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>; Rafik Dammak 
> (rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx) <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment? 
>  
> Dear Karla:
> I am persuaded by both Alan and Cheryl's comments to say 'publish'. 
> 
> Let's wait to hear from Rafik and assuming he agrees, I would request a 
> formal submission of the report for public comments.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Carlton  
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> Not so at all. Chartering orgs must approve that it is treated as a position 
> of that org. But interim reports are regularly out for comments of various 
> sorts.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> At 07/06/2011 03:37 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>> I was under the impression that the chartering orgs must act to a) accept or 
>> b) reject the report before it is submitted to the wider world.   So the 
>> holdup in this instant case led to the doors of the GNSO.
>> 
>> Given all that we know, I will accept the sure advice and proceed 
>> accordingly.
>> 
>> Best,
>> CAS 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
>> =============================
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx > 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please note the Milestone Report 2 has not yet been posted for public 
>> comment. Previous work from the JAS WG has been posted for public comment.
>> 
>> Please let me know how would you like to proceed.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Karla Valente
>> 
>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>> 
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  
>> 
>> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  
>> 
>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  
>> 
>> Skype: kdlvalente
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy