ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?
  • From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:47:56 -0500

Jeff:
I think a hold for 2 days is quite all right.

Best,
Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  All,
>
> I know I am only an observer, but can I ask that you wait until after the
> gnso meeting just 2 days from now. I have a feeling we will approve it being
> published for comment and it would certainly ease some of the heartburn some
> in the gnso are having.
>
> So as a favor, may I request holding off for just 2 days.
>
> Thanks.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>  *From*: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 07:25 PM
> *To*: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc*: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>; Rafik Dammak (
> rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx) <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>;
> SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public
> comment?
>
> Dear Karla:
> I am persuaded by both Alan and Cheryl's comments to say 'publish'.
>
> Let's wait to hear from Rafik and assuming he agrees, I would request a
> formal submission of the report for public comments.
>
> Kind regards,
> Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Alan Greenberg 
> <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>  Not so at all. Chartering orgs must approve that it is treated as a
>> position of that org. But interim reports are regularly out for comments of
>> various sorts.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> At 07/06/2011 03:37 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>>
>> I was under the impression that the chartering orgs must act to a) accept
>> or b) reject the report before it is submitted to the wider world.   So the
>> holdup in this instant case led to the doors of the GNSO.
>>
>> Given all that we know, I will accept the sure advice and proceed
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Best,
>> CAS
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>> =============================
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all:
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note the Milestone Report 2 has not yet been posted for public
>> comment. Previous work from the JAS WG has been posted for public comment.
>>
>> Please let me know how would you like to proceed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> Karla Valente
>>
>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878 <%2B%201%20310%20301%203878>
>>
>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639 <%2B1%20310%20936%204639>
>>
>> Skype: kdlvalente
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy