Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public comment?

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have No Problem with that at all...  still allows us to 'publish before
Singapore  and then to direct peoples attention to their need to comment
while we have them in meetings  discussions  presentations  etc., where the
matter may come up...

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 8 June 2011 11:47, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jeff:
> I think a hold for 2 days is quite all right.
>
> Best,
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>  All,
>>
>> I know I am only an observer, but can I ask that you wait until after the
>> gnso meeting just 2 days from now. I have a feeling we will approve it being
>> published for comment and it would certainly ease some of the heartburn some
>> in the gnso are having.
>>
>> So as a favor, may I request holding off for just 2 days.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
>> Vice President, Law & Policy
>> NeuStar, Inc.
>> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>  *From*: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 07:25 PM
>> *To*: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Cc*: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>; Rafik Dammak (
>> rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx) <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>;
>> SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: Milestone Report 2 - public
>> comment?
>>
>> Dear Karla:
>> I am persuaded by both Alan and Cheryl's comments to say 'publish'.
>>
>> Let's wait to hear from Rafik and assuming he agrees, I would request a
>> formal submission of the report for public comments.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Carlton
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>> =============================
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Alan Greenberg 
>> <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>>  Not so at all. Chartering orgs must approve that it is treated as a
>>> position of that org. But interim reports are regularly out for comments of
>>> various sorts.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> At 07/06/2011 03:37 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that the chartering orgs must act to a) accept
>>> or b) reject the report before it is submitted to the wider world.   So the
>>> holdup in this instant case led to the doors of the GNSO.
>>>
>>> Given all that we know, I will accept the sure advice and proceed
>>> accordingly.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> CAS
>>>
>>> ==============================
>>> Carlton A Samuels
>>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>> =============================
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note the Milestone Report 2 has not yet been posted for public
>>> comment. Previous work from the JAS WG has been posted for public comment.
>>>
>>> Please let me know how would you like to proceed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Karla Valente
>>>
>>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>>>
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>
>>> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878 <%2B%201%20310%20301%203878>
>>>
>>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639 <%2B1%20310%20936%204639>
>>>
>>> Skype: kdlvalente
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>