ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Capturing feedback from today's face-to-face

  • To: "'Elaine Pruis'" <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Capturing feedback from today's face-to-face
  • From: "Dave Kissoondoyal" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:10:02 +0400

Dear Elaine,

Let us not limit us for Support meaning financial only. The issue brought in
the JAS WG meeting in Singapore, by Mohamed, was that registrars are scarce
in Africa (one of the developing economies) and this could be the result of
many factors, financial being one. Perhaps non financial support could also
be something that could induce the spread of registrars in those economies. 

Thanks and best regards

 

Dave Kissoondoyal 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 5:41 AM
To: ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Capturing feedback from today's
face-to-face


Though I agree that local registrars in developing economies are  
scarce, I strongly disagree with the concept of JAS working towards  
propping up registrars in developing economies. It is outside our  
charter and would be a diversion of funds that (as soon as announced)  
have been proclaimed as too little for the charted task.  The ccTLD  
operators would be the most natural avenue for registrar creation and  
growth in developing economies, and with the impetus coming from the  
ccTLD space, these new registrars would have a market ready-product to  
cut their teeth on before new gTLDs are delegated sometime in 2013.

Elaine

On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:05 PM, ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>
> Colleages,
>
> Mouhamet Diop suggested that the scope of assistance to applicants
> include the issue of the sales channels the applicants will have as
> registry operators, independent of the selection of registry platform
> service provider.
>
> There was spirited discussion, and as a participant I hope I'm not
> doing an injustice to the participants who expressed the concern
> that registrars are out of scope, or can come later. In my view
> registrars in developing economies are useful, possibly necessary,
> and need starting as soon as possible, selling existing inventories,
> and building local presence as an alternative to North American and
> European registrars as default registrars.
>
> I propose that we submit through our co-chairs to the sponsoring
> organizations statements to the effect that supporting applicants
> in developing economies extends to the market channels available
> also in developing economies, possibly local to the applicant as
> an eventual registry operator.
>
> Eric

Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy