[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] From Eric Brunner Williams

[Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
>From: ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG Consensus Indicators - Request
>for Action
>Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:08:29 -0400
>Sender: ebw@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Colleagues,
>
>Please excuse this as a belated report-to-the-mailing-list of status from
>Singapore.
>
>There was agreement among the members of the small ALAC plus GAC drafting
>team that the GAC target of $47k per is a workable solution to most of the
>plural script use cases.
>
>The application fees for dual- or triple-string applications are within a
>range we thought equitable, to the applicants, as expenses, and to ICANN,
>to meet evaluation cost, without embarking on the problematic course of
>finding "the incremental cost of" a second or subsequent strings.
>
>The notable exception is South Asian scripts, for which either special
>case
>pleading to the Board could be offered, or incremental partial plural
>applications would suffice resulting in the full plurality after the
>January-April 2012 window, again with possible special case pleading to
>the Board for continuous intra-round increments, or in within the windows
>of subsequent rounds.
>
>The issue has been addressed by the ALAC members of JAS who participated
>in the small ALAC-GAC meeting(s) in Singapore. If there are GNSO members
>of JAS, or individual members of JAS who have alternate proposals to
>resolve an issue for which there was agreement in Singapore, or who are
>unclear on the above, please let me, or Avri, or Evan, or Cintra know.
>
>Eric
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>