Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: applicant purpose (was: Comments On Draft text)

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric

Sorry for the top post - in a rush :)

If the party providing the services and its funding is NOT ICANN then I don't 
have any issue with someone doing it 

If it is ICANN then why can't they do it for my pet TLD ?

Why does it have to be only for XYZ .. ?

M

On 3 Aug 2011, at 14:45, <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:

> Michele,
> 
> I'm adding a proposal for a publication component -- support to applicants
> to include resources to distribute zone files and answer authoritative
> queries -- the usual multi-site, ANYCAST addressed, bind9 + at least one
> other resolver provider package.
> 
> I assume you'll make the case why applicants should not be allowed, in this
> as in the registry function (posted), the registrar function (to be posted
> today) proposals, to accept this resource, severally or jointly, and why
> ICANN should be barred from offering or causing third parties to offer this
> resource, for the same conflict of interest and competition policy reasons.
> 
> Given the vast difference in our perspectives, I'm interested in where your
> point of view finds support to be possible without causing onflict of interest
> and competition policy causes of action where ICANN is domiciled. 
> 
> Eric

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845