<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft summary of public comment (second milestone report) ready for JAS WG review
- To: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft summary of public comment (second milestone report) ready for JAS WG review
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 23:44:39 +0200
Hello Michele,
On 03/08/2011 20:49, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote :
> The long and short of it is that IPv6 isn't all that hard to deploy.
> Every mainstream server OS today supports it well, all decent networking
> hardware has good support and the larger transit providers are all
> either providing it right now or have advanced plans in place.
Ok for the hardware.
But what do you do when country X doesn't have a drop of IPv6 connectivity?
Should this preclude an applicant from applying, point blank?
Tunnelling is not the answer because it's only going to install a wider
local tendency to delay native v6 introduction, isn't it?
Kind regards,
Olivier
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|