Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft summary of public comment (second milestone report) ready for JAS WG review

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olivier

The DAG refers to ipv6 - it doesn't specify that it has to be native.

We are, as far as I know, dealing with DAG requirements and nothing else.

Regards

Michele 

Mr. Michele Neylon
Blacknight
http://Blacknight.tel

Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity

On 3 Aug 2011, at 22:44, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <ocl@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Michele,
> 
> On 03/08/2011 20:49, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote :
>> The long and short of it is that IPv6 isn't all that hard to deploy.
>> Every mainstream server OS today supports it well, all decent networking
>> hardware has good support and the larger transit providers are all
>> either providing it right now or have advanced plans in place.
> 
> Ok for the hardware.
> But what do you do when country X doesn't have a drop of IPv6 connectivity?
> Should this preclude an applicant from applying, point blank?
> Tunnelling is not the answer because it's only going to install a wider
> local tendency to delay native v6 introduction, isn't it?
> Kind regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>