<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On staggered fees versus reduced fees
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On staggered fees versus reduced fees
- From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:28:43 -0400
The recommendation for fee reduction achieved complete consensus pre-MR2 and
need not need be revisited. We don't have the luxury of constant hindsight
with one week left.
- Evan
On 23 August 2011 13:15, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The point I take from this, is that while we probaby have rough/near
> consensus, Michele's note indicates that we do not have full consensus on
> this issue.
>
> For the record I support the notion of recommending both.
>
> And if it had to be either/or would sooner drop the staggered fee
> recommendation, which I beleive the staff indicated would be impractical,
> than i would drop the fee reduction recommendation/advice.
>
> a.
>
> On 23 Aug 2011, at 08:58, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
> >
> > On 23 August 2011 06:43, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <
> michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > To be perfectly honest I'd be more supportive of staggered fees than I
> would be of reduced fees
> >
> >
> > The point is that it shouldn't be either/or. Both are valid.
> >
> > - Evan
> >
> >
>
> ------
> Pick your poison: Kool-Aid or Hemlock!
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|