<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- From: Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:27:05 -0700
> Karla Valente:welcome to the JAS WG September 13 call
> Carlton Samuels:Hi Karla, waiting for call from Veronica
> Gisella Gruber-White:Kurt Pritz has joined the call
> Gisella Gruber-White:Carlton has now joined
> Carlton Samuels:Hi everyone
> CLO:We agreed to the appendix for attendance already aj dhappy to have
>an inbedded hyperlink yo a wiki page spread sheet for details on per
>meetings etc.,
> Krista Papac:+1 Alan!
> Gisella Gruber-White:Andrew Mack has joined the call
> Gisella Gruber-White:Sebastien Bachollet has joined the call
> Evan Leibovitch:Truth be told, this is completely backwards.....
>adressing the comments to the interim document AFTER the final one is
>almost completely locked down.
> avri:Evan, I disagree, we should be answering how we repsonded. we
>should not be changing the components of the final report.
> avri:we did discuss the comments at an eairier time.
> Alan Greenberg:Avri, the issue is that if we had formally reviewed the
>comments prior to finalization, we might well have read something we had
>not thought of and changed the result. BUt it is sadly too late for that
>now.
> Evan Leibovitch:oh well. water under bridge
> avri:but we had read them and did act on them.
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS WG notes the support for the
>process and thanks the respondents.
> Alan Greenberg:Then it is unfortunate that we did not document that
>discussion...
> avri:that is what we need to do now. document what we did and why we
>did it.
> avri:the what we did is clear from the final draft. the why is easy in
>the case we did what they wanted. harder when we didn't - that requires
>recall.
> avri:what we can't do is start recosidering everyhting, or even
>anything.
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:I agree with Cheryl. Never heard a discussion
>about different time frames; Did I miss it?
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS WG has briefly discussed timing
>and, in general, agreed this could be an issue, however outside the WG¹s
>scope. The timing was mainly left to ICANN staff.
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:ok. excellent
> Seth Greene:Carlton and Rafik, with your permission, Rob and I will
>leave the call now in order to continue polishing the Report -- to ensure
>getting it to the Co-Chairs asap today. Thanks very much, and you will
>hear from us later today. Thank you all for what has been a productive
>drafting effort.
> Carlton Samuels:Very well,Seth. Thanks to both Rob and you
> Rafik:@Seth&Rob thank you very much :)
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS WG, in its Final Report, is
>proposing a parallel process.
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS WG thanks the respondents and is
>thankful for the Board for this seed money. JAS WG agrees that there
>should be more the 2 million and this is why JAS WG final recommendations
>incorporate the fees decrease proposal. Moreover, the Jas WG recommends a
>foundation where this seed money serves as a start and more funds are
>raised in the future. See final report for detailed proposal.
> avri:yep that works for me Karla.
> CLO:Yes the last (3rd) comment is out of scope for JAS-WG IMO
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS WG thanks the respondents and is
>thankful for the ICANN Board for allocating this ³seed² money. JAS WG
>agrees that there should be more than $2 million and this is why in its
>Final Report recommendations suggest fees to be decreased. Moreover, the
>JAS WG recommends a foundation where this seed money serves as a start
>and more funds are raised in the future. See final report for detailed
>proposal.
> CLO:Ok for the draft Karla has proposed
> CLO:on audio only for a short while
> Karla Valente:The campaign outreach comment is welcomed, but the JAS WG
>believes it is outside the WG¹s scope.
> Gisella Gruber-White:Seth and Rob have disconnected
> Karla Valente:The best practices comment, the JAS WG recognized that
>there will be extensive help required and having templates, best
>practices and other guidelines are good suggestions. The overall concept
>supported, nonetheless, this type of help should come from expert
>community members and not ICANN.
> Karla Valente:Best practices comment: the JAS WG recognized that there
>will be extensive help required and having templates, best practices and
>other guidelines are good suggestions. The overall concept supported,
>nonetheless, this type of help should come from expert community members
>and not ICANN. There are various suggestions made in the Final report to
>the type of community support that could be used. JAS WG encourages the
>community to come to the aid of JAS qualified applicants in the
>non-financial assistance mechanism.
> Rafik:the communication already started
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS agrees this is an issue;
>however, control over this issue is outside the JAS WG¹s scope. JAS WG
>encourages the community, with its knowledgeable members, to help with
>outreach and created local awareness as much as possible.
> Karla Valente:The JAS WG believes ICANN should provide support to local
>communities to assist with outreach activities.
> Karla Valente:JAS WG response: The JAS agrees this is an issue;
>however, control over this issue is outside the JAS WG¹s scope. JAS WG
>encourages the community, with its knowledgeable members, to help with
>outreach and created local awareness as much as possible. The JAS WG
>believes ICANN should provide support to local communities to assist with
>outreach activities. The Final Report is describing in more details the
>concept of a staff community partnership.
> Seth Greene:Hello, Rob and I are returning to the call.
> Alan Greenberg:If Rob and Seth are back, and there are report issues to
>be discussed, we should focus on them in the last 15 minutes of the call.
> Karla Valente:@ Avri: thank you!
> Alan Greenberg:Yup.
> Karla Valente:looking forward to working with you another 6 hours this
>week ;-)
> avri:likewise Karla
> CLO:I do Not support removal of the para OR to remao silent on the
>issue raised by GAC
> Evan Leibovitch:It should be reminded that the GAC was made jointly
>with one of the JAS sponsorsing organizations. It's also the ALAC
>position now too.
> Evan Leibovitch:"GAC _statement_"
> Evan Leibovitch:IE, it's a mistake to paint this as GAC vs JAS.
> Tijani:ok, no problem
> Evan Leibovitch:+1 Seth
> CLO:corrwct No change
> avri:if there was any change, i would recommend replacing the word
>recommend with advice in the last sentence.
> Krista Papac:+1 alan
> avri:as this indicates that they won't be making a recommendation to us
>at this point, but will be giving advice to the Board
> avri:but i am not arguing for this, just thorwing it into the confusion
>- albeit late - i am a slow thinker sometimes.
> Evan Leibovitch:Doing the webinar English only means that it's not
>necessarily targeted at the economies that could most benefit from what
>the WG is doing. This -- more than many other efforts -- is worth of i18n
>treatment
> Rafik:we can organize other wbeinar
> Rafik:why not tryin ones in differnet languages
> Krista Papac:bye everyone
> avri:Ok, i can be volunteered for the Italian and Hebrew webinars.
> CLO:if there is a choice I'd prefer to do additional meetings on the
>Tue time slot and NOT the Friday one where possible
> Rafik:@avri u think italy is among developing economy regardless their
>financial crisis
> avri:CLO you mean the Saturday slot?
> Rafik:@clo indeed no more friday
> Rafik:just one callper week
> CLO:Well it is Friday midnight + foe me yes
> Rafik:just one callper week[
> avri:hey we are recruiting people who can help as well as people who
>need help.
> avri:we need to make outreach to people with bags of money as well as
>people with bags of talents and skills
> CLO:Not that I have not "enjouyed spendong so many Friday Nights with
>you all of course ;-)
> Rafik:@avri well sure why not in japanese which is one of language used
>by icann for many translation ;)
> Rafik:@clo I want my social life in friday back :D
> avri:i can't be volunteered for the one in Japanese. i was only
>mentioning the langauges i was comfortable with. You can do the one in
>Japanese.
> CLO:I can do Australian (limited audeince though)
> avri:CLO: why there are displaced australinas everywhere i look. the
>Australian disapora is huge.
> CLO:and may not male it through many 'censors'
> CLO:sorry MALE it through many censors :-)
> avri:lol
> CLO:should reF make IT THROUGH
> CLO:@ Avri yup and we all rspond to a G'day mate
> CLO:OK Bye for now then...
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|