ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Government eligibility for JAS support

  • To: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Government eligibility for JAS support
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:17:06 -0500


Without going back and looking at the report or the GAC/ALAC statement, my recollection is that we (the JAS group in its report) nixed all levels of government and I believe parastatal organizations (ones that are technically private but owned/controlled by government) and the GAC/ALAC statement said all should be allowed other that national governments (and by extrapolation, national government parastatals).

So, local, regional, state, province gov'ts would be allowed.

Clearly making the claim of poverty might be harder for some of these, but that is their problem (in my view).

Note that although I do have a personal view on this, I was not advocating anything, just saying that it was a loose end that we said we would tie up, so we should.

Alan

At 21/11/2011 10:57 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Alan

So they're differentiating between local government and national government? Or did I miss something?

Regards

Michele


On 21 Nov 2011, at 15:50, Alan Greenberg wrote:

>
> The issue of government eligibility was left open in our report.
>
> The GAC had suggested that governments be eligible with the exception of national governments.
>
> I do not recall that there was any substantive objection to this from within the JAS group (perhaps I was deaf to such objections though).
>
> I suggest one of two objections:
>
> - If there was/is substantive objection to the GAC proposal, that those who object document their problem with it, and we take a consensus call to see if there is general support for or against the GAC proposal.
>
> - If there is no substantive objection, then I suggest that the JAS group issue an addendum to the report saying that we agree with the GAC proposal.
>
> There are likely other options as well, but regardless, we need to close this gap, and do it quickly.
>
> Alan
>

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions ♞
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.biz
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Facebook: http://fb.me/blacknight
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy