Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Draft Presentation for Cartagena

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Jim.  Just one question: I had thought that we talked about not using
Whois to mean directory services in general, but that we could still use
"WHOIS protocol" to mean just that.  Is that not the case?  If not, what do
we use instead of WHOIS protocol?

Thanks again,
Julie


On 11/17/10 6:17 PM, "Jim Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> One more important thing we need to include is to clearly change the
> vernacular.  On slide 3, Introduction, the phrase "in WHOIS services"
> is highlighted in red.  I assume that's because during the
> presentation you are going to introduce the phrase "directory
> service".  Further, you'll explain that WHOIS is used to refer to both
> a protocol and a data model.
> 
> With that, we need to be absolutely clear throughout the presentation
> to use the phrases "directory service" and "registration data",
> expressly not using the phrase WHOIS.
> 
> There is one use of directory services and the rest say WHOIS.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> 
>> Dear IRD-WG members,
>> 
>> Here is the draft presentation for Cartagena for your review, which
>> includes the changes I received from Owen.  Please respond with any
>> changes by COB this Thursday, 18 November so that I can prepare a
>> revised draft for review prior to the discussion on our call on
>> Monday, 22 November at 1600 UTC (0800 PST/1100 EST).  Please feel
>> free to enter changes directly into the document and I will
>> reconcile them with other comments received into one draft.
>> 
>> Thank you very much for your assistance.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>> <Internationalized Registration Data Interim Report Presentation
>> Draft 15 Nov 2010.ppt>
>