RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Draft Presentation for Cartagena
- To: "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Draft Presentation for Cartagena
- From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:38:57 -0800
I have some concerns with slides 11 and 12.
On slide 11: I thought it was agreed that there was no support for model
4 as presented here, which is translation into the English language (not
into a "script" -- lots of languages use basically the same script as
Furthermore, this slide may be confusing because it does not say who
"provides data" in any of the three models. Do we mean "registrant
provides data" in each case?
On slide 12, the model 1 examples present translation into a language
(English), not just transliteration into a script (US ASCII). In fact,
Model 1 could look identical to model 3, the only difference being who
is responsible for changing what the registrant provides (assuming the
registrant is not providing data in US ASCII) into what is displayed in
the directory service. In model 1, that is the registrant's
responsibility; in model 3, that is the registrar's responsibility.
I apologize if this is retreading old ground but I don't think we have
been clear enough on what the differences are among these models.
[mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James M. Galvin
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 6:17 PM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: James M. Galvin; ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Draft Presentation
One more important thing we need to include is to clearly change the
vernacular. On slide 3, Introduction, the phrase "in WHOIS services"
is highlighted in red. I assume that's because during the presentation
you are going to introduce the phrase "directory service". Further,
you'll explain that WHOIS is used to refer to both a protocol and a data
With that, we need to be absolutely clear throughout the presentation to
use the phrases "directory service" and "registration data", expressly
not using the phrase WHOIS.
There is one use of directory services and the rest say WHOIS.
On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> Dear IRD-WG members,
> Here is the draft presentation for Cartagena for your review, which
> includes the changes I received from Owen. Please respond with any
> changes by COB this Thursday, 18 November so that I can prepare a
> revised draft for review prior to the discussion on our call on
> Monday, 22 November at 1600 UTC (0800 PST/1100 EST). Please feel free
> to enter changes directly into the document and I will reconcile them
> with other comments received into one draft.
> Thank you very much for your assistance.
> Best regards,
> <Internationalized Registration Data Interim Report Presentation Draft
> 15 Nov 2010.ppt>