Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Update (2) re: FOR REVIEW: DRAFT IRD-WG Slides for Silicon Valley Meetings

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

I know of no concerns.  By all means if others agree we can invite Sarmad
and John.  The WG is open to all who want to participate and have the
expertise.  Let's see if anyone has any concerns and, if not, perhaps I can
invite them on behalf of Jim and Edmon and the WG members.

Thanks,
Julie


On 3/8/11 7:41 PM, "Jim Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's fine with me although I don't know if there are any rules or
> process associated with doing so.
> 
> Julie, are you aware of any concerns?
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> -- On March 7, 2011 7:35:33 AM -0800 "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
> wrote regarding RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Update (2) re: FOR REVIEW: DRAFT
> IRD-WG Slides for Silicon Valley Meetings --
> 
>> 
>> Since nearly half of this deck is devoted to summarizing the comments
>> received, it's perhaps worth noting that only two comments were
>> received.
>> 
>> Since both comments made some very useful points, why don't we invite
>> the two commenters to join the working group going forward?
>> 
>> Steve Metalitz
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________
>> From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
>> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:06 AM
>> To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Update (2) re: FOR REVIEW: DRAFT IRD-WG
>> Slides for Silicon Valley Meetings
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Please see the edits to slides 8 in red from Jim Galvin in the
>> attached revised version of the slides.   Provide your
>> comments/questions on these slides not later than NOON EST/1900 UTC
>> on WEDNESDAY, 09 March.
>> 
>> Thanks for your help.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>> On 3/4/11 6:11 PM, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Please note that the timing of the briefing to the GNSO Council on
>> Saturday has changed.   It is now from 16:00 to 16:30 as follows:
>> 
>> Saturday, 12 March 2011, 16:00-16:30, Tower Salon A, Lobby Level:
>> Briefing of the IRD-WG to the GNSO (15-minute presentation; 15-minute
>> Q&A)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Julie
>> 
>> On 3/3/11 5:15 PM, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Edmon, Jim, and WG members,
>> 
>> As we agreed at our last IRD-WG meeting, support staff have drafted
>> the attached slides (in .ppt and .pdf) for your review for the two
>> briefings on the work of the IRD-WG at ICANN Silicon valley meeting.
>> We¹ve tried to keep the slides brief while including as much
>> information as possible from the comments we¹ve received thus far
>> in the public forum.  These slides are an amalgam of those we used
>> for the outreach forum (which you reviewed previously) and a brief
>> summary of comments received in the forum.  We¹ve also included
>> some background information, but just for reference ‹ not for
>> presenting.
>> 
>> There are two opportunities in San Francisco for the IRD to brief the
>> community.  The first is a 25-minute briefing to the GNSO on Saturday
>> the 12th.  The second is a 60-minute meeting of the IRD-WG on
>> Thursday that will start out with an update on the Interim Report.
>> We suggest that we could use the same slide deck for the two
>> meetings.  Here are the details:
>> 
>> Saturday, 12 March 2011, 17:05-17:30, Tower Salon A, Lobby Level:
>> Briefing of the IRD-WG to the GNSO (15-minute presentation; 10-minute
>> Q&A)
>> Thursday, 17 March 2011, 9:00-10:00, Olympic, 2nd Floor: IRD-WG
>> Update on Interim Report (15-minute presentation; 10-minute Q&A;
>> balance of time for IRD-WG meeting/discussion)
>> 
>> Edmon ‹ Please let us know whether you would like to brief the GNSO
>> if you are available.
>> Jim or Edmon ‹ Please let us know which of you would like to do the
>> briefing on Thursday, or if you would prefer that staff do it.
>> All WG members: Provide your comments/questions on these slides not
>> later than NOON EST/1900 UTC on WEDNESDAY, 09 March.
>> 
>> Thank you very much for your assistance.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>