Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Notes: IRD-WG Call 25 July 2011

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Terry.  We’ll send the dial-in information with the reminder a little 
later this week.

Julie


On 7/25/11 2:00 PM, "Terry Fusco" <tfusco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Scott Austin will attend - please send invite with call-in information.

thank you.

________________________________
From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:29 PM
To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Notes: IRD-WG Call 25 July 2011

All,

Here are the actions and notes from today’s call.

**PLEASE NOTE/RSVP: Our next call is scheduled for next Monday, 01 August 1500 
UTC/0800 PDT/1100 EDT.  Please RSVP by Friday 29 July whether you can attend.

Best regards,
Julie

IRD-WG Call 25 July 2011

Actions: WG members review the revised draft extended outline and provide 
comments prior to the next meeting.

Notes:

General questions/suggestions:

 1.  Do we want to make a recommendation related to policy?   In particular, do 
we want to say that it would be good to have  uniformity between ccTLDs and 
gTLDs? (See text provided by Steve Metalitz)
 2.  Suggest throughout the document that we speak about  WHOIS services 
independent of ccTLD or gTLD — just focus on service  requirements.  The 
distinction should be left to the reader.   Question: How can we speak to ccTLD 
practices if we don’t know what they  are?  Jim will offer some suggestions for 
Steve S.

Suggestions for each Section:
1.1 — Objectives and Goals: how do the recommendations tie to the two 
objectives — suitability and feasibility?
2.1 — Addresses — change to postal address and add email address at the end.
2.2 — Add the distinction on the second bullet relating to “thin” registries.  
Describe also where each is collected and stored.  Delete “managed” from the 
header for section 2.2.  The response should say “data elements are stored 
here, collected here, etc.”


________________________________

San Francisco * San Diego * Los Angeles * Sacramento * Orange County * Las 
Vegas * Portland * Seattle * Houston * Chicago * Phoenix * Dallas * New York * 
Long Island * Florham Park * Denver * Miami * Atlanta * Austin * Connecticut

This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WHICH ALSO MAY BE 
LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and is intended only for the use of the intended recipients 
identified above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, 
you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, dissemination, 
distribution, downloading, or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify us by reply email, delete the 
communication and destroy all copies.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
To ensure compliance with requirements by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. 
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) 
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing 
or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
GORDON & REES LLP
http://www.gordonrees.com <http://www.gordonrees.com/>