ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[stld-rfp-mail]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Comments on the new .mail TLD proposal

  • To: <stld-rfp-mail@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Comments on the new .mail TLD proposal
  • From: "Fu" <fu@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:01:51 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcQqFBWGt2nMJ+GMSCqq5EzNSQIVFw==
  • Thread-topic: Comments on the new .mail TLD proposal

The .mail TLD proposal sounds like nothing more than a money making scheme for Spamhaus.  The hefty registration fee, their oversight, etc. are completely unnecessary.  The technology already exists to achieve the same result and it doesn’t require a monopoly to oversee it.  Any new proposal which grants a monopoly to something as important as email verification should not be taken seriously.

 

The same effect can be achieved by requiring that all incoming email is signed by a known, trusted key.  Keyrings can be maintained the way that whitelists are maintained now.  Messages that are not signed by known trusted keys are rejected or filtered to a “possible junkmail” folder.  A simple key exchange mechanism can be employed to grant new senders the right to send email.

 

This scheme is much more flexible and can be implemented on many levels.  Email clients can maintain personal key lists, servers can maintain trusted server lists, etc.  There are several established competing CA that can be used between unknown parties and of course, any ISP, business, etc. can establish it’s own CA for use by it’s members.  This type of scheme gives ISPs, businesses, and users the flexibility and power required for a successful system.  Devoting the power to one group is both unnecessary and ill-advised.

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy