1 (backward) <
( 2 ) (forward) 2
- More reasons NOT to approve dot .mail,
Greg Krajewski
(Thu Apr 15 12:12:36 2004)
- AccuSpam Rebuttal to [ASCR REPLY: Individual responses from the Anti-Spam Community Registry],
AccuSpam
(Sat Apr 17 10:26:30 2004)
- .Mail is unnecessary (already been mostly tried and failed),
AccuSpam
(Sat Apr 17 11:32:14 2004)
- I strongly approve of .mail, but...,
Herbie Robinson
(Sat Apr 17 18:55:54 2004)
- We hope .Mail is approved...,
AccuSpam
(Sun Apr 18 10:51:46 2004)
- Propose change to .Mail to make it more useful and feasible,
AccuSpam
(Sun Apr 18 12:36:41 2004)
- Please do it for the children,
John Caballero
(Mon Apr 19 13:53:03 2004)
- Comments on the new .mail TLD proposal,
Fu
(Sat Apr 24 08:53:33 2004)
- Comments from JPNIC Domain Name Policy Study Group,
dom-sec
(Fri Apr 30 05:43:43 2004)
- A More Broadly Based Approach Is Needed,
Ross Elliot
(Fri Apr 30 15:44:57 2004)
- This is what i think ...,
allan holdsworth
(Sun May 02 13:48:45 2004)
- dot mail is good idea BUT small nonprofit should be exempt from $2000 dollar charge !,
Jim Watson
(Tue May 04 09:17:47 2004)
- Re: AHBL threatens to blacklist .mail if ICANN grants it,
Andrew D Kirch
(Tue May 04 11:33:58 2004)
- Why .mail is unworkable,
Stephen Lange Ranzini
(Wed May 12 10:45:08 2004)
1 (backward) <
( 2 ) (forward) 2
Mails in Archive: 74
Mails per page: 60
Archive Updated: 2004 May 18 15:56:43 (local time zone is Central European)
|