DO NOT APPROVE .XXX I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS

["info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear ICANN,

This email is a comment in opposition to the Proposed Registry  
Agreement for
the .XXX sTLD by ICM Registry. The .XXX sTLD should be rejected in  
finality
for the following reasons:

* The .xxx TLD is opposed by every sector and community it affects. This
includes people working in the adult entertainment industry (including
Hustler, Vivid, Penthouse, XBIZ, porn’s Free Speech Coalition, and Adult
Friend Finder), anti-porn family and religious organizations  
(including The
Family Research Council), thought leaders in the technology sector,  
and the
ACLU.

* Despite ICM’s constant assurances of various industry representation  
and
support, there is no evidence of community support for .XXX.

* The .xxx TLD will do nothing to solve problems surrounding adult  
content,
manage adult content or protect children from inappropriate content. The
higher purposes of ICM’s proposal have been abandoned. (As of this  
email the
page on ICM Registry’s website about “Promoting Online Responsibility”  
for
.XXX is blank and reads “Information to follow” as does the page titled
“Contracts, Policies and Bylaws.”)

* There has been absolutely no proof of an “unmet need” for the .XXX  
TLD.
* There is no concrete, agreed-upon definition of “adult content.”

* The ACLU expresses serious concerns about the implications of .XXX  
outside
the U.S., where in some countries, regulations around .XXX would  
certainly
be enforced punitively. To this effect, the .XXX TLD raises human rights
concerns.

* .XXX makes no business sense except to profit from defensive  
registration
(brand squatting).

* Senators Max Baucus (D-MT) and Mark Pryor (D-AR) have introduced
legislation to make the use of .XXX compulsory for all web sites that  
are
“harmful to minors.”

* .XXX raises serious issues around spurious and unsupported TLD’s in  
regard
to the impact of ICANN on rulings on civil and human rights, and ICANN’s
role in content-based discrimination.

In light of the above, I object to .XXX and urge ICANN to reject .XXX.

Regards,
R RUSSELL D