Re: [alac] Processing the At Large Structure applications

[Izumi AIZU <izumi@xxxxxxx>]

Ｉ agree that we should start the process of reviewing.
And I will start my part, one from Jordan. I can do my part by
next Friday, and hope to reach consensus with others in my
region.

Thanks,

izumi

At 09:11 03/10/14 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> Since I didn't see any objection or comment on the proposed process 
> (version 2) in six days, I guess we can consider it approved.
>
> So I think we could start reviewing the pending applications, which AFAIK are:
>
>    Number: 1
> Applicant: Societß
Internet (ISOC Italy)
>   Country: Italy (Europe)
>   Contact: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Received: August 28, 2003
>    Status: accepted
> Reviewers: Thomas Roessler, Roberto Gaetano, Denise Michel
>
>    Number: 2
> Applicant: Worlali Senyo
>   Country: Ghana (Africa)
>   Contact: Worlali Senyo <wsenyo@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Received: September 26, 2003
>    Status: incomplete
>
>    Number: 3
> Applicant: Arab Knowledge Management Society
>   Country: Jordan (Asia/Pacific)
>   Contact: Ibrahim Nakhala <akms@xxxxxxxx>
>  Received: September 29, 2003
>    Status: accepted
> Reviewers: Izumi Aizu, Tommy Matsumoto, Hong Xue, Denise Michel
>
>    Number: 4
> Applicant: Sudan Internet Society
>   Country: Sudan (Africa)
>   Contact: Yassir Elamin <yassir@xxxxxxx>
>  Received: September 29, 2003
>    Status: accepted
> Reviewers: Pierre Dandjinou, Clement Dzidonu, Sunday Folayan, Denise
>            Michel
>
>    Number: 5
> Applicant: Alfa-Redi
>   Country: Peru (Latin America)
>   Contact: Erick Iriarte Ahon <eiriarte@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Received: October 13, 2003
>    Status: accepted
> Reviewers: Sebastian Ricciardi, Tadao Takahashi, Denise Michel
>
> About #2, I'm wondering whether it's actually an organization or just an 
> individual; about the others, apparently they are ok, but Denise had 
> contacts with the applicants so she may have more information.
>
> I think we should try to keep this list updated (perhaps under the form 
> of a spreadsheet or online database) so that at every time we know what 
> the situation is.
>
> Also, if possible, the reviewers should start doing their job in the next 
> couple of weeks, so that we can maybe try to approve some applications in 
> Carthage (by voting on the list, so that also those members who can't 
> attend the meeting can vote). Do you deem feasible to conclude these 
> reviews by Friday 24, just before leaving for the meeting?
>
> Comments?
> --
> .oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo vb.
> Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu.org
> http://bertola.eu.org/    <-- Vecchio sito, nuovo toblog!


                     >>> Izumi Aizu <<<
                 Asia Network Research
                        www.anr.org
 GLOCOM /Institute for HyperNetwork Society
        << Writing the Future of the History >>