Re: [alac] Re: At Large Structure application

[Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas

Lo pongo en español..
jamas creeria que la intransigencia pudiera llegar a tanto, el no aceptar 
que somos diferentes linguisticamente y culturalmente, el obligar a todos a 
hablar lo mismo es algo que no entiendo. Si todos hacemos el esfuerzo por 
avanzar, es porque creemos, pero uno de los principales problemas que tiene 
el ICANN ha sido el que no ha desarrollado conocimiento e información en la 
mayoria de la población. O es que acaso todos los peruanos saben ingles?, o 
todos los latinos?.. es obligatorio saber ingles para participar del 
ICANN?.. hasta las naciones unidas tienen traductores!!!..

No puedo creer que expreses tu voto a priori porque no conoces un idioma... 
sabes que haria yo.. buscaria un diccionario... o tomaria la posición de 
Vittorio, pedir ayuda a otros, pero es tan facil decir no entiendo...

Ahora como mi ingles es pesimo, y solo lo uso para leer y entender algo, y 
por eso te puedo responder  tratara de colocar algo en ingles..

En ingles..

Maybe in peru only a few percent of the population understand and speak 
english, in latin america, and another countries and regions are similar... 
our principal problem (in the icann), are : "if you don't know english you 
can't participate"!!... what happend with the millions of persons who 
doesn't know this language?

I hope we can help in the translation for anothers, but we need to know our 
differences and try to work in the similar way.. i hope someday learn 
german to speak the language of my father.. but until that, i'm very proud 
of my spanish....

Erick

At 11:24 a.m. 14/10/2003 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2003-10-14 08:50:05 +0200, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
> > (Whether we need a full translation of the application, or
> > whether the English review would be enough for us to vote, is
> > something we have to decide - personally, I think that an English
> > review could be enough if it's not too summarized.)
>
> The bylaws require a 2/3 majority for the approval of an at-large
> structure, not "some process."
>
> It is, of course, a good thing to delegate most of the work to
> people from the region and to staff, but I feel that at least the
> information from the application should be available to all
> committee members in order to enable them to make a fully informed
> decision.
>
> As I said earlier, I won't vote "yes" for any application that I
> don't understand.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/