Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Sat, July 8, 2000 at 1:18 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Misunderstanding
Message:
First line - I agreed with what you said. No further comment required. Thereafter, I addressed previous posting of pride5356 about pornography. >not FEASIBLE or DESIREABLE to patrol the TLDs to make sure that each and every webpage is in tandem with the respective TLD charter. (i.e.  .com for commerce, ....... Agree with you entirely - these are NOT restricted domains anyway. We are in complete accord in ALL you have wrote in this post. Which is nice.

Message Thread:

• .XXX - Let's Get Control of Pornography — pride5356, July 8 @ 2:25 AM (1/12)
• Just some thoughts. . . — 410, July 8 @ 11:09 AM (2/11)
• What is needed — GregInHouston, July 8 @ 2:46 PM (3/7)
• Giving them a place to go — chadlupkes, July 8 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
• .SEX vs. .COM — friedrich, July 8 @ 4:39 PM (1/3)
• Frightening. — WorldThoughts, July 8 @ 5:22 PM (1/2)
• Hmmm ... — friedrich, July 8 @ 6:01 PM (1/1)
• .adult and .kids — fnord, July 8 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)
• Hmmm. . . — WorldThoughts, July 8 @ 3:35 PM (1/1)
• re: Hmmm. . . — greginhouston, July 9 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)
• Agree with 410 — Garry Anderson, July 8 @ 12:08 AM (1/2)
• Not quite what I was saying, though. — 410, July 8 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)
• Misunderstanding — Garry Anderson, July 8 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy