Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Mon, July 10, 2000 at 11:49 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	A Monopolistic Viewpoint - Nestor
Message:
>Trademark holders would get a fair soulution if they all got to use the unrestircted gTLD (globally), This is sanctioning the misuse of trademarks for anti-competitive purposes. It is illegal. Also very greedy viewpoint to take. A fairer way - all could have name in same TLD - you could ALSO have widgets.class.us.REG as a Certificate of Authentication for your customers. To see simple explaination, please see my posting above, THIS has to be sorted first ...

Message Thread:

• MY RESPONSES TO YOUR POSTED QUESTIONS ON NEW gLTDs-My effortsof 2 days; 1 night &  1 "all-nighter"! — Nestor_DR, July 9 @ 7:48 AM (2/9)
• CONTEXT: RELEVANT CONGRESSIONAL DOCUMENTS -- U.S. CONGRESS -- HOUSE — Nestor DR, July 10 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)
• 51 pages WOW! — Merlin, July 9 @ 9:00 AM (1/7)
• Come-on! — friedrich, July 9 @ 3:06 PM (1/6)
• FAIRLY AND SQUARELY — Nestor DR, July 9 @ 6:50 PM (2/5)
• A Monopolistic Viewpoint - Nestor — Garry Anderson, July 10 @ 11:49 AM (1/1)
• GARRY: PLEASE NOTE THE CONTENT--AND--CONTEXT, SO AS TO NOT HASTILY JUMP TO PRETEXTS OF *ILEGALITY* — Nestor DR, July 10 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)
• You are a strenuous person Nestor, but the .reg solution is imperative. — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:39 PM (2/2)
• IF THE POWERS-THAT-BE OFFICIALLY EXPAND THE ROLE OF ICANN RE TRADEMARKS YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING — Nestor DR, July 10 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)
• PLEASE KINDLY SEE MY LATEST THREADS ABOVE: *CONGRESSIONAL CONTEXT* & *RESPONSE TO GERRY* — Nestor DR, July 10 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy