Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	walkere72
Date/Time:	Mon, November 13, 2000 at 10:19 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.0 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	diebold
Message:
I object to the use of inflammatory language in the ICANN staff reports -- this company's report as an example -- the use of "substantial" - in " the company withdrew a substantial portion of it's proposal"  -- how am I supposed to interpret that?  Have the prior messages from marshm covered all the material that was removed? In order to make an informed judgement, we need to know.  This is a new company to me, I had to look it up -- financially it is solid with a proven track record in providing return for its investors - so it's not like they will be affected by a tight capital market.

Message Thread:

• Diebold Incorporated response to ICANN Staff Report — marshm, November 13 @ 9:05 PM (1/4)
• Additional information on Key Diebold Personnel — marshm, November 13 @ 9:13 PM (3/3)
• Thanks Diebold — lapointe, November 14 @ 3:03 PM (0/0)
• Benefits of Diebold are obvious — Ray, November 14 @ 4:37 AM (0/0)
• diebold — walkere72, November 13 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy