ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[wildcard-comments]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wildcard-comments] VeriSign's Deployment of DNS Wildcard

  • To: wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [wildcard-comments] VeriSign's Deployment of DNS Wildcard
  • From: hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:08:32 -0700
  • Sender: owner-wildcard-comments@xxxxxxxxx

VeriSign's deployment of DNS Wildcard is not only unnecessary it’s a hindrance to the domain naming system as a whole.  A domain name that does not resolve should do just that, not resolve. That’s the way it’s always been and that’s the way it should stay. 

We have heard many comments from “confused”  users about this service. Many people think a domain name is taken just because a site appears, when in fact it’s an available domain name. There is no valid reason for this Wildcard system.

Like others, we sometimes comment out a zone of slow pay/no pay user to get their attention.  These domains should not display any web page at all.
VeriSign's responsibility is stepped far beyond in this case.     

Over the past three years we have seen the number of errors on our own DNS servers increase by several hundred percent while trying to resolve host names.  This tells us that there is a great deal of equipment out there that is not configured correctly.  Please, let’s not complicate the system further with this new un-needed twist.

Respectfully
John Carson    RapidSystem Hosting sites from 6 continents
http://www.RapidSystem.net
http://www.NTHosts.com
http://www.DedicatedSystems.net


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy