Re: [alac] next Nom Com
Roberto Gaetano ha scritto: When I first read this thread, my instinctive answer was: "Of course Vittorio is right, it will work both ways, incompatibility is incompatibility, and is a symmetrical relationship". However, on second thoughts, I think that Wendy is right. The rationale is, I think, that what the Bylaws try to prevent is that participation to NomCom provides unduly advantage to candidates to positions that are populated by NomCom. However, the reverse is not considered dangerous. We might have different opinions on what should be the case, but the language seems pretty clear to me. But, IANAL, so I might be wrong. Which would mean that I have been wrong twice on a single subject! Actually, I've checked with reliable sources and it seems that while other people have raised my point, the current official interpretation is Wendy's one, up to the point that there are GNSO Council members serving on this year's Nomcom. This matter is flagged for consideration in the upcoming NomCom review, but for this year there is not any incompatibility between ALAC and Nomcom if you were appointed to the ALAC first. -- vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<----- http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
|