Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1

["Maniam s" <maniam01@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,
I agree to this point too, and think these suggested additions are acceptable.

On 3/19/07, Alexei Sozonov <sozon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Regarding 4.2.1...
>
> From the Cyrillic/Russian community we're supporting Yoav with this
> change...
>
> Alexei Sozonov
>
>
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Yoav Keren
>   To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 3:28 PM
>   Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1
>
>
>   Ram, Olof, all,
>
>
>
>   The issue in section 4.2.1 is an issue that was probably brought up during
> a call that I have missed. First I would like to state my own support for
> this view. Second, I think we should elaborate a little more and add more
> examples and clarification to this point. I would like to offer the
> following wording, which is the original one with two short additions marked
> between 3 stars:
>
>
>
>
>
>   Support for considering local/regional pre-existing developments regarding
> IDN gTLDs, for example, the experimental IDN system run by the Arab League,
> ***China and other countries in a smaller scale*** when considering
> introduction of new IDN gTLDs, ***to avoid potential confusion/backlash.***
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   Thanks,
>
>
>
>   Yoav