ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2

  • To: "Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2
  • From: "Alexei Sozonov" <sozon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:38:42 -0800

I support that... Same condition for everybody that is agreed to by gTLDs and 
ICANN... it's a good fare idea. 


Alexei


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sophia B 
  To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx ; GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 5:11 PM
  Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.2


  4.3.2 

  I though this minor change of adding a clause to this alternative view would 
allow both flexability for the gTLDs operators while reducing any possible 
confusion. 

  Alternative view; to afford latitude for gTLDs to set policy for IDN SLDs on 
condition that any selected policy that is uniform for all concerned gTLDs and 
that such a policy is approved by ICANN before hand.
   
  Sophia


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy