RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

I am OK with the document prepared by Ken.  In my review, the two
biggest gaps in the final report are item 3(b) (cross SO/AC
communications) (as noted by Ron below) and item 4(d), where as pointed
out there is not much of an explicit focus on use of  communications in
recruitment of volunteers to participate in working groups.  It may be
that these gaps could be pretty easily filled by the CCT, since it
strikes me that implementation of the other recommendations would help
in both areas.  
 
Since we seem to think that the website recommendations are in pretty
good shape, is there any reason why we could not ask staff simply to
carve those out of the report and send them along to the GNSO council as
a first phase of the CCT report?  It was not clear to me just what we
would be asking the CCT to do with this part of the report.   If we
think it is basically ready then why shouldn't it move forward? 
 
Thanks to Ken for pulling this material together and to my OSC
colleagues for their close reading of the CCT report.  
 
Steve Metalitz 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:37 AM
To: Ron Andruff; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report


Thanks Ron.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
        Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:45 AM
        To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final
Report
        
        

        Chuck,

         

        I support the document submitted by Ken, and would underscore
the importance of the CCT WT addressing bullet #3 (b) Example 2:  Cross
SO/AC Communications.  This is an area that has been discussed many
times within the various constituencies of the CSG and is something we
feel very needed going forward.  Thanks to Ken/you for flagging that.

         

        Kind regards,

         

        RA 

         

        Ronald N. Andruff

        RNA Partners, Inc.

        220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

        New York, New York 10001

         

        www.rnapartners.com 

        V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

        F:  +1 212 481 2859 

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: 2009-11-18 04:10
        To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final
Report

         

        Not seeing any volunteers for the OSC memberships, I asked Ken
Bour to prepare a draft response to the CCT WT's final recommendations
document.  Ken attempted to incorporate the comments communicated on
this list as best as possible; some were easier that others.

         

        Please review and comment on this document with the goal of
finalizing it for sending it to the CCT.  If you approve it, please
state so.   If possible, I would like to finish this task NLT than seven
days from today, 25 Nov 09.

         

        Thanks, Chuck