[gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

["Ken Bour" <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve, et al.:

 

I just wanted you to know that work has already begun to bifurcate the CCT's
original report into two installments.   

 

A draft of CCT Report I-Technology was completed last week and circulated to
Mason Cole (Chair), Steve Holsten (Vice Chair), and members of the Policy
Staff.   Mason and I are actually scheduled to discuss it tomorrow.    

 

An initial draft of Report II has also been prepared; however, the Policy
Staff would like to continue working on it this week and, given the
holidays, possibly into the first week of December before it is shared with
Mason and the CCT.    At this stage, it remains to be determined what steps
may ultimately be required to complete this second set of recommendations.


 

Regards,

 

Ken Bour

 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:41 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Ron Andruff; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

 

I am OK with the document prepared by Ken.  In my review, the two biggest
gaps in the final report are item 3(b) (cross SO/AC communications) (as
noted by Ron below) and item 4(d), where as pointed out there is not much of
an explicit focus on use of  communications in recruitment of volunteers to
participate in working groups.  It may be that these gaps could be pretty
easily filled by the CCT, since it strikes me that implementation of the
other recommendations would help in both areas.  

 

Since we seem to think that the website recommendations are in pretty good
shape, is there any reason why we could not ask staff simply to carve those
out of the report and send them along to the GNSO council as a first phase
of the CCT report?  It was not clear to me just what we would be asking the
CCT to do with this part of the report.   If we think it is basically ready
then why shouldn't it move forward? 

 

Thanks to Ken for pulling this material together and to my OSC colleagues
for their close reading of the CCT report.  

 

Steve Metalitz 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:37 AM
To: Ron Andruff; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

Thanks Ron.

 

Chuck

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:45 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

Chuck,

 

I support the document submitted by Ken, and would underscore the importance
of the CCT WT addressing bullet #3 (b) Example 2:  Cross SO/AC
Communications.  This is an area that has been discussed many times within
the various constituencies of the CSG and is something we feel very needed
going forward.  Thanks to Ken/you for flagging that.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA 

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

New York, New York 10001

 

www.rnapartners.com 

V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

F:  +1 212 481 2859 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 2009-11-18 04:10
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

 

Not seeing any volunteers for the OSC memberships, I asked Ken Bour to
prepare a draft response to the CCT WT's final recommendations document.
Ken attempted to incorporate the comments communicated on this list as best
as possible; some were easier that others.

 

Please review and comment on this document with the goal of finalizing it
for sending it to the CCT.  If you approve it, please state so.   If
possible, I would like to finish this task NLT than seven days from today,
25 Nov 09.

 

Thanks, Chuck