RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Updated version of PEDNR Final Report posted

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. There as bound to be at least one reference 
that didn't get updated when we renumbered the recommendations. Good catch.
Alan

At 13/06/2011 01:29 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> Rec. 17 - references rec. 7. Should that be rec. 16?
>
>
> Tim
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Updated version of PEDNR Final Report posted
> > From: Marika Konings
> > Date: Mon, June 13, 2011 6:00 am
> > To: "gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx"
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Please find attached an updated version of 
> the PEDNR Final Report posted on the wiki 
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsopednr/2.+WG+Documents+%28Drafts+-+Published%29) 
> that incorporates the edits suggested by Alan 
> (see 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-pednr-dt/msg00839.html) 
> as well as the attendance information. If no 
> further minor edits / typos are submitted 
> today, this version will be submitted to the GNSO Council tomorrow, 14 June.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Marika
> >
> >