ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Motion to Approve VI Charter

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Motion to Approve VI Charter
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:00:16 -0500

Please note, regardless of what I may have communicated to the contrary, the 
deadline for motions is not until 2 March.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:54 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Motion to Approve VI Charter
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> none on the motion.  i support the submission of this motion.
> 
> but if i were a council member reviewing the charter, i might 
> ask questions and it might affect my willingness to vote at 
> this point. maybe not, who knows?
> 
> so it occurred to me, that notwithstanding getting a motion 
> submitted in time today, it might be worth this team 
> reviewing that part of the charter which we have never spoken 
> of and which still contains my original typos.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 24 Feb 2010, at 11:03, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Avri.
> > 
> > Your comments have no incidence on the proposed motion, right?
> > 
> > Stéphane
> > 
> > Le 24 févr. 2010 à 10:55, Avri Doria a écrit :
> > 
> >> 
> >> hi,
> >> 
> >> Looks fine.
> >> 
> >> Question:
> >> 
> >> How do we account in the charter for the fact that we 
> applying for a charter that has dates we have already missed?
> >> Also i am not sure that we have an exact match between the 
> milestone and the objectives.
> >> I scoped those out before we had the whole discussion on 
> Objectives and before we missed the first deadline - they 
> probably need some adjustment.
> >> And if we already know that we need 16 weeks from approval 
> of the charter instead of 16 (maybe 14) from the approval of 
> the PDP  - then maybe we should say so upfront.
> >> 
> >> a.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 24 Feb 2010, at 10:37, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Thanks Chuck.
> >>> 
> >>> For the benefit of the DT members, please note I have 
> suggested the following edits to the motion.
> >>> 
> >>> If plan to make the motion today, and would appreciate a 
> second from this group if possible.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> 
> >>> Stéphane
> >>> <MOTION TO APPROVE CHARTER SVG Edits.doc>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Le 23 févr. 2010 à 22:42, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> >>> 
> >>>> Margie kindly drafted the attached draft motion to 
> approve the VI PDP WG charter once it is finalized.  Once the 
> DT finishes its work, I would appreciate it if Councilors on 
> the DT would make and second the motion on the Council list.  
> Of course, you may modify it as you like.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The deadline for making motions for the 10 March meeting 
> is 2 March.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Chuck
> >>>> <MOTION TO APPROVE CHARTER for VI PDP.doc>
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy