Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11 Jun 2010, at 23:25, <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I object. It would make the poll meaningless.

Agreed

The poll was "sold" to us as a means of getting some idea of what WE ie. 
members of this group felt - not anything more 

If there is a public comment period and the group decides that running a poll 
as part of that comment period is a good idea, then I'd support the idea, but 
until then - no


> There would be no way to confirm who is who. But if we go that route I'd like 
> a day or two notice so I can get the word out to all of our staff :)

And I'll see your staff and raise you ours + anyone else I can get on board :)

> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:05:57 
> To: Avri Doria<avri@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] REVISED Proposal-support poll
> 
> 
> as your co-chair and scribe, i don't have any objection to others taking the 
> poll.  but it would make my life a lot easier if they indicated that they are 
> not WG members when they fill out their entry so i can tell who is who when i 
> summarize the poll.  i admit, i worry a little bit about craziness and 
> pranks, but i'm willing to wait and cross that bridge if we come to it.
> 
> Roberto?  you have any thoughts either way on this?
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> that is what I have assumed it meant all along. 
>> silly me.
>> 
>> of course doodle only has 3 states as far as i know.
>> 
>> by the way any objection to people not on the VI list, but who have been 
>> following,  taking the poll?
>> 
>> Also we have more than 25 members on the VI list.  where are the others?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> On 11 Jun 2010, at 16:04, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Too late now, but in retrospect, a fourth option of "I could accept this 
>>> WITH some modification" might have been interesting. I would have included 
>>> JN2 in that category, as an example.
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> At 10/06/2010 04:39 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> i so horked up the poll i decided to redo it.  same URL, but i deleted the 
>>>> 4 answers that were there -- so please revisit the poll if you filled it 
>>>> out.  apologies for that.
>>>> 
>>>>     http://www.doodle.com/3pzabi8d9frrpvb7
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> mikey
>>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>>> phone   651-647-6109
>>>> fax             866-280-2356
>>>> web     www.haven2.com
>>>> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
>>>> etc.)
>>> 
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
> 
> 

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845