Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

I understood GREEN to mean, whatever your position is, you are willing to 
compromise on it.

whereas YELLOW meant whatever your position is you might be willing to discuss 
it but this one will be tough.

and RED meant you have your position -  that is that - and you are not willing 
to compromise  on that position.

or at least that is what i think i suggested.

a.

On 14 Jun 2010, at 11:43, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> Mikey, according to how I read your words, if one answers Green to (for 
> instance) "Require use of ICANN-accredited Rr's", then you are willing to 
> compromise and NOT require use of Registrars, and if you answer Red,  you are 
> insisting that Registrars MUST be used.
> 
> This seems counter-intuitive.  Or did I mis-interpret your intent?
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> At 14/06/2010 10:57 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> hi all,
>> 
>> i've put together another poll for you.  this one "inverts" Kathy's matrix 
>> -- so instead of stating your views about the proposals, this one asks you 
>> to state your views about the headings in the table -- the "atoms."
>> 
>> i've stolen Avri's idea for the definitions of the choices;
>> 
>> Green - definitely willing to compromise 
>> Yellow - maybe some compromise is possible 
>> Red - dead set viewpoint - deviation is a deal breaker
>> 
>> 
>> here's the link to the poll.
>> 
>> http://www.doodle.com/6vz2spk4a6t5m2cu
>> 
>> i've tightened up the security a little bit this time through -- i'm the 
>> only person who can delete/modify entries this time.  we'll see how that 
>> goes.
>> 
>> thanks!
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109  
>> fax  866-280-2356  
>> web www.haven2.com
>> handleOConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)