Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

[Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>]

Have to say I agree with Milton here.  Referencing  the poll[s] in the
formal report actually provides useful information to those not following
the WG.

Um, don't quite understand the concern about possible misinterpretation of
the poll.  If ever I had a dollar for every time some......well, person
would misinterpret what is written...   This lands the duty of care on the
writer of the report to say unambiguously what the polls mean or.......is
intended to convey!

Carlton Samuels

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================


On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> I wish to express my view that the poll results should be used - they are
> an accurate reflection of the level of support enjoyed by various proposals.
> It would be a travesty to withhold this information from the report, and if
> that happens then I and others will make a public issue of it,
> It seems rather obvious to me at least that people whose proposals didn't
> do as well as expected are the ones calling fro suppressing the results of
> the poll
>
> --MM
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Ken Stubbs [kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:22 AM
> To: Anthony Harris
> Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this
> time
>
> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> I have the same concerns...
>
>
> On 6/15/2010 11:28 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Tim's suggestion.
> >
> > Tony Harris
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
> > this time
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree
> >> with Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but
> >> these polls are confusing.
> >>
> >> I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a
> >> lot until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in
> >> the report to Council.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> ------Original Message------
> >> From: Mike O'Connor
> >> Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> To: Avri Doria
> >> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms"
> >> this time
> >> Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM
> >>
> >>
> >> hi all,
> >>
> >> we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll
> >> and concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers
> >> easier to understand.  Doodle seems to be at it's limit.  so i've
> >> closed the Doodle one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey
> >> based, since i've got an account) Real Soon Now.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> mikey
> >>
> >>
> >> - - - - - - - - -
> >> phone 651-647-6109
> >> fax  866-280-2356
> >> web www.haven2.com
> >> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> >> Google, etc.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>