RE: [soac-mapo] FW: First Draft of Initial Report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your assessment seems accurate to me Avri.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:59 AM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] FW: First Draft of Initial Report
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I understand.
> 
> So in a sense it is also voluntary for GNSO members.  That was not
> clear.
> 
> I know I keep getting bogged down in this equality and equal treatment
> thing, and I apologize.  But if we can't treat the members of the
group
> equitably, it will be hard for us to treat the gTLD applicants
> equitably.
> 
> Note: I submitted my SOI before making the complaint so that I would
> not be accused of wanting to keep secrets by making the complaint.
> 
> 
> a.
> 
> On 9 Sep 2010, at 16:47, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > I am not aware of any basis upon which we may require participants
> from
> > other SO's and AC's to submit Interest Statements.  In the GNSO,
that
> is
> > a requirement for our WGs but this is a community WG.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx]
> On
> >> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:37 AM
> >> To: soac-mapo
> >> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] FW: First Draft of Initial Report
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 Sep 2010, at 16:30, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >>
> >>> Everyone is invited to submit a SOI, not just GNSO participants.
> >>>
> >>> Chuck
> >>
> >>
> >> Invited but not required?
> >>
> >> a.
>