Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm fine with this letter...


On Jan 7, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> The letter works for me.  Thanks to Jon for the rapid response.
> 
> Carlton
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rec6 CWG Colleagues:
> 
> Thanks for everyone's time on today's call.  Attached are redline and clean 
> versions of the proposed letter to the Board.  Please review and let the 
> group know if you have any changes/substantive objections.  We always have 
> the option -- as we discussed on the call -- to append any objections from 
> group members if they so desire.  
> 
> Please also take a close look at the last paragraph of the letter related to 
> the name of the Rec6 objections.  This came out of our final few minutes on 
> the call.  For one, I probably would delete this paragraph.  It seems a bit 
> petty and not all that helpful, but I don't feel strongly enough by any means 
> to append an objection on it.  I found an e-mail from Marika on September 
> 13th with the following poll results, which I think somewhat weakens some of 
> the points made on the call:
> 
> a.             "Objections Based on the Principles of Ordre Public": 7/20
> 
> b.            "Public Order Objections": 0/20
> 
> c.            "Public Interest Objections": 8/20
> 
> d.            "Objections Based on General Principles of International Law': 
> 14/20
> 
> e.             “Objections based on the General Principles of Ordre Public or 
> International Law”: 9/20
> 
> 
> 
> As discussed, we are trying to have Chuck send the letter to the Board in the 
> next 24 hours to meet the Board's deadline.
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>