Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	neila
Date/Time:	Mon, October 16, 2000 at 1:02 PM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.51 using Windows NT
Score:	5
Subject:	Support for dot union
Message:
Increasing the number of tld's is essential as part of the broadening of the accessibility and functionality of the Internet, and the proposal for "dot.union" is right up there amongst the best proposals to ICANN for new tld's. After having to navigate my way around ICANN's web site in English to make these comments (and I speak English -heaven help those who don't!), I have been pleasantly surprised to read that the .union proposal includes provisions to make the TLD function in all ICFTU official languages (eg. ".union", ".syndicat", ".sindicato", ".gewerkschaft").  About time someone started thinking about how to make the Internet more inclusive.  It seems to me that the .union proposal is exactly that.  Making the Internet more inclusive. This proposal has to be supported.  The Internet has to be for everyone, it has to be made simple for everyone to navigate around, and to understand.  I give this proposal my whole hearted support. Neil Anderson

Message Thread:

• .union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:01 PM (107/118)
• Support for .union — fnpsf-cgt, December 22 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
• .union TLD — Dan Yager, November 5 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — HRHL, November 5 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)
• Support message — kristina, November 4 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
• setting up a union top level domain on the internet — twu, November 3 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Manon Ress, November 3 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — AFA07, November 3 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
• Yes, do it! — meretz, November 3 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
• .union proposal — Daly, November 2 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — LCJapan, November 2 @ 7:48 AM (0/0)
• Support tor .union — Bernie Corbett, November 1 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
• we support the trade union proposal — miquel, November 1 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)
• suport for .union — terje, October 31 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)
• IPMS supports dot union — Lynn Stephenson, October 31 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — IFBWW, October 31 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)
• support for union — Freek, October 31 @ 6:38 AM (0/0)
• .union — ipaterson, October 30 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
• Suport for .union — ovemh, October 30 @ 8:58 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — LO-N, October 30 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)
• union Application by International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) — stgunnes, October 30 @ 10:07 AM (0/0)
• support for .union — Helga Svendsen, October 30 @ 5:23 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Magne, October 28 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)
• .union proposal — Art, October 28 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)
• Pride At Work Supports .union — Kkualii, October 28 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Richard_S, October 27 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — violetlight, October 27 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
• Support .union — lescault, October 27 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)
• ICANN — Niki, October 27 @ 2:57 PM (0/0)
• Domain union — budreaua, October 27 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
• SUPPORT FOR UNION DOMAIN NAME — arqitekt, October 27 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)
• support for the ICFTU proposal re tld ".union" — peter murphy, October 27 @ 4:10 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — lobo, October 26 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)
• dot union — julie bignell, October 26 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
• Approve ".union" Internet extension — Timothy Engels, October 25 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
• Support for ".union" — gilbert, October 25 @ 8:12 AM (0/0)
• Support of dot union proposal — Espen, October 25 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)
• .union — jceille, October 24 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — sabocat, October 24 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)
• whole hearted support of .union — csnead, October 24 @ 1:17 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — mayafan, October 24 @ 1:05 PM (1/1)
• Support for .union — abible, October 24 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Connect, October 24 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• We support the trade union proposal! — nomet, October 24 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)
• support — esr4, October 24 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)
• Support for .Union — JRussell, October 23 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — kwru, October 23 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Perry, October 23 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
• No on .union — redbeard, October 23 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — rmberkowitz, October 23 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
• I strongly support .union — xernaut, October 23 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot .union — MichaelL, October 23 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)
• whole hearted support — winnie9898, October 23 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
• big buisness — bingo, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
• dot union-application by ICFTU — SPchig, October 23 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)
• I support noncommercial .union domain — Therese Quinn, October 23 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)
• YES — ceberr, October 23 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
• Dot.Union - YES — cykonno, October 23 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
• .UNION — rfretel, October 23 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)
• support .union — mpolson, October 22 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — Brad, October 22 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)
• ICFTU application for dotunion TLDs — jasondotcom, October 22 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
• UnionTLD — angie, October 22 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)
• dot union — richard55, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
• connect the dots — mbj, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
• Supporting the dot union/syndicat — Segol, October 21 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)
• I support the proposal .union on Internet — orichet, October 21 @ 1:57 PM (2/2)
• Support for union.com — Brad , October 22 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)
• WHY YOU SHOULD OPPOSE THIS — Richard Flint, October 21 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
• Yes - dot union — salmela, October 21 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot .syndicat — LeGrand, October 20 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — alevin, October 20 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
• I support .union — kilmer, October 20 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)
• Support for .union — warmanns, October 20 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)
• We support the trade union proposal — Jose Marcos-Sanchez, October 20 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — Olyves, October 20 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)
• YES for new TLD dot union — BETOR, October 20 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union TLD — usdaw, October 20 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
• OK Go on — ARIANA, October 20 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — FrancoisM, October 20 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)
• support for .union — rachel, October 20 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — henri, October 20 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Vadim Borisov, October 20 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — leppik, October 20 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
• Not a good idea — Richard Flint, October 19 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)
• Response — pruett, October 20 @ 4:59 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — werhane, October 19 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
• Support for ".union" — lmfernandez, October 19 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)
• union tld — tutaref, October 19 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
• COSATU supports ICFTU's .union TLD proposal — Charley Lewis (COSATU), October 19 @ 9:15 AM (0/0)
• I support .union domain name — edlfler, October 19 @ 4:45 AM (0/0)
• tld.union — arun, October 19 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
• Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — pgrugan, October 18 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)
• support for dot union domain from the UK's TUC — nigel stanley, October 18 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — noe420, October 18 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
• support .union — iufmos, October 18 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)
• support for .union — Lika Galkina, October 18 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — CTUC, October 18 @ 9:34 AM (0/0)
• I support .union — migrantworker, October 18 @ 9:09 AM (1/1)
• .union for unions — jcleeland, October 19 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)
• .union is universally appropriate — GeneHaldeman, October 18 @ 2:38 AM (0/0)
• NUGFW supports dot union — NUGFW, October 17 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — Peter_Cole, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• More support for dot union — labrlwyr, October 17 @ 7:15 PM (0/0)
• The DGC supports the .union TLD application — DGC, October 17 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — davidc, October 17 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — Seth Wigderson, October 17 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)
• .union tld — co-rowan, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
• Support for .union — JLDENV, October 17 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
• support for .union — mo'sullivan, October 17 @ 5:34 AM (1/1)
• support for .union — snichol, October 17 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot.union — asubrigid, October 17 @ 4:36 AM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — ccaruso, October 17 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)
• Support for .union — UNI, October 16 @ 1:58 PM (1/1)
• .union application hast support from FES — schweise, October 26 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)
• Support for dot union — neila, October 16 @ 1:02 PM (1/2)
• support zee dot.syndicat — sapacontinent, October 17 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)
• support for dot union — bojon, October 28 @ 7:54 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy