Re: [alac] RESULT: ALS #21 - Intellectual Property & Technology (IPT) Section of the Hawaii State Bar Association

[Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 03:17 PM 1/6/2006 +0100, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> Annette Muehlberg ha scritto:
> > in the process of correcting votes, Wendy's ABSTAIN was only half 
> > way integrated - she should not be on the "Missing list" but on ABSTAIN
>
> Annette, I do not have any message from her on this vote call, and 
> she confirmed that she did not send any:

I confirmed that I "abstained" not that I was "missing."  If you need 
me to send another "abstention,"

# 21 IPT

ABSTAIN

This is all a bit silly.
--Wendy


> > To correct the record, I abstained from voting on this application.
> > --Wendy
>
> so she is listed as missing, rather than abstained (which means, 
> explicit abstentions). It does not make any difference, in any case.
> But I am seriously thinking to set up a special email address and 
> use an autoresponder to let you get a receipt of your votes - so we 
> avoid the problem of lost messages etc.
> Thanks,
> --
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...

--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org