Re: [alac] regional, cultural, city TLDs
- To: John L <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [alac] regional, cultural, city TLDs
- From: Jacqueline Morris <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:40:15 -0400
I totally agree - the role of the Board should be to set the policy and then
review it periodically, not sit and personally evaluate each applicant...
seems like they want to make work for themselves, or create a bottleneck and
discourage applicants by attrition! How long does it take now? 6 years? and
thousands and thousands of dollars!
We need a simple, equitable and transparent set of criteria. Meet those and
get your TLD. Don't meet, don't get.
On 17 Jan 2006 16:38:17 -0500, John L <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why should ICANN grants the registry business to some guys promoting
> > (and other sponsored TLDs) and not for those who think their special
> > interest deserve a new gTLD!
> No reason I can think of.
> That's why ICANN desperately needs a set of TLD policies so a clerk can
> handle the applications rather than having to waste months of board tome
> on them.
> John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Mayor
> "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
T&T Music and videos online