<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [alac] ALS applications
- To: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [alac] ALS applications
- From: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:31:43 +0200
I just got the consideration by Jaqueline, that of course it should be
possible to integrate non-english-speaking ALSes in the ALAC
discussions (for example we could do that on a regional level), but we
still have to make sure that the applications are in english to enable
ALAC members to vote on it.
My proposal would be that either ALAC members who speak the respective
language or ICANN staff take care of the translation, as we need the
application in english - otherwise it is impossible for all ALAC members
to make a qualified decision.
Annette Muehlberg wrote:
We still have several pending ALS-applications, but we did not get on
all of them a due diligence form by ICANN, which is the pre-requisite
for us to vote on them.
Bruce will, possibly with the help of the regional liasons, try to get
them done as soon as possible. Then, the ALAC members of each region
will explain if they agree to accredit the ALSes of their respective
region. After this, all ALAC members will have a couple of days to
discuss all applications, than we are going to vote. Jean already set
up her great voting tool for all pending ALSes, so we are almost ready
to start.
One of the pending applications is written in spanish which has to be
translated into english to enable all members of the ALAC to
understand and vote.
We have to improve the application-forms: They are in several
languages, which is good, so that people easily get an understanding
on what has to be done to get accredited as an ALS. But it has to be
clear, that all applications must be *send in* in english, as the ALAC
needs to understand what the potential ALS is about and it is a
requirement that the respective organisation can take part in the
ALAC/ICANN discussions in english.
Best
Annette
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|