ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] Comment on new gTLDs TOR

  • To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [alac] Comment on new gTLDs TOR
  • From: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:05:02 +0200



Vittorio Bertola wrote:

John L ha scritto:

I object to the TOR 2.15 recommendation: "Applicants must offer a clearly differentiated domain name space with respect to defining the purpose of the application. "



I agree; the experience with the new gTLDs to date shows that attempts to make semantic evaluations of domain applications have not had good results.

> > If the intention is to prevent typosquatting, they should say so.

Support. I would be more comfortable if the recommendation was rewritten to clearly specify the cases in which an application would be unacceptable, rather than those in which would be acceptable; I think that ICANN should regulate on the basis of "everything is allowed except what is explicitly forbidden", rather than the opposite.

Support.

I actually would be happier if it was explicitly said that competition to an existing gTLD with semantic equivalents is encouraged, rather than forbidden.


Support.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy