Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic plan

[Nat Cohen <ncohen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Members,

Thanks for all the work that has gone into drafting and reviewing this
response.

One key responsibility of ICANN is not mentioned in the document, and that
is administration of the UDRP.  The UDRP is now in its 15th year.  ICANN
has largely abdicated its responsibility to oversee the implementation of
the UDRP, leaving an ever increasing number of UDR providers to develop
their own separate approaches.

As the UDRP determines the limits of a registrant's rights to its its
domains, and how those rights can be cancelled, a uniform, predictable UDRP
is fundamental to maintaining a secure and stable 'identifier ecosystem'.

The first Focus Area Goal would be an appropriate location to reference the
UDRP:

*Foster and coordinate a secure, stable and resilient identifier ecosystem,
including the stable, secure, trusted operation of the DNS.    *

The Outcome of this focus would be "to Improve the uniformity and
consistency of implementation of the UDRP across UDR providers and to
eliminate bias".

For the measurement criteria, I would propose conducting an outside, expert
audit/white paper reviewing the implementation of the UDRP and then making
specific policy changes based on the findings of the audit/white paper
review.

Regards,

Nat Cohen
President
Riptide LLC
Telepathy, Inc.




On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Chris Chaplow <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Members,
>
>
>
> Thanks Aparna for making updates to the document.
>
>
>
> I am fine to accept the changes and in particular for the sections that I
> authored. I would ask that Tim Cheng,  Andrew Mack and Martin Sutton also
> advise of their respective sections.
>
>
>
> David,  I am not aware of any existing BC position on the issue or scope
> of Public interest.    Your suggestion  that we recognize that public
> interest issues within the context of ICANN's mandate are within its
> purview, seems a reasonable approach.
>
>
>
> If Aparna can restore the public interest points within this, and post
> back to the list, it would be a step forward.
>
>
>
> We need to submit the final version on the 31st January.
>
>
>
> Many thanks for contributing.
>
>
>
>  best
>
>
>
> *Chris Chaplow*
> *Managing Director*
> *Andalucia.com S.L.*
> Avenida del Carmen 9
> Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
> 1ª Planta, Oficina 30
> Estepona, 29680
> Malaga, Spain
> *Tel: + (34) 952 897 865 <%2B%20%2834%29%20952%20897%20865>*
> *Fax: + (34) 952 897 874 <%2B%20%2834%29%20952%20897%20874>*
> E-mail: *chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx* <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Web: *www.andalucia.com* <http://www.andalucia.com/>
> *Information about Andalucia, Spain.*
>
>
>
> *De:* owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] *En nombre
> de *Aparna Sridhar
> *Enviado el:* lunes, 27 de enero de 2014 19:13
> *Para:* Marilyn Cade
> *CC:* Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO list; Chen, Tim; Chris at Andalucia
> *Asunto:* Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for
> 5-year strategic plan
>
>
>
> All--
>
>
>
> Please see some suggested edits from Google on the attached document.
>  While there is some amount of reorganizing, I believe our suggested edits
> preserve the points made in the original document while making some
> improvements for flow and clarity.  I have also suggested deviation from
> ICANN's proposed submission form where adhering to it obscured the content
> of our comments.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aparna
>
>
> Aparna Sridhar
>
> Counsel
>
> Google Inc.
>
> 1101 New York Avenue N.W.
>
> Second Floor
>
> Washington, DC 20005
>
> tel:  202.346.1261
>
> e-mail: aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I will draft something for ICANN mission/lingage to I-GOV. I wanted to
> hear from CCWG and 1NET first, and that happened this week.
>
>
>
> I also moved this to bc-private just temporarily.
>
>
>
> David, Aparna, Philip, and I were on CCWG and David, Aparna, and others
> from business COMMUNITY, were on relevant calls last week. I will send a
> short assessment over week end.
>
>
>
> If members want public access to our discussions, we can move back to
> public list, but I didn't want to do that, without full consideration from
> BC members.
>
>
>
> M
> ------------------------------
>
> From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year
> strategic plan
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:27:45 +0000
>
>
>
> Attached is the current draft BC comment on ICANN's Vision, Mission &
> Focus for 5-year Strategic Plan, which came out of last summer's
> "brainstorming" by board, community and staff. 
> (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/focus-areas-29oct13-en.pdf>
> )
>
>
>
> Tim Chen and Chris Chaplow led drafting of the BC comment, with help from
> Martin Sutton, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.
>
>
>
> Comments close 31-Jan, so today begins our 14-day review period.
>
>
>
> We need draft comments for Focus Area V: Defining role clarity for ICANN
> in the Internet governance ecosystem.
>
> Yesterday I shared my views about ICANN limiting its mission and avoiding
> entanglements in the broader I-Gov debate.       If no BC members
> contribute text for Area V, then I can draft something next week.
>
>
>
> Please REPLY ALL with edits (TRACK CHANGES)as soon as possible, since the
> comment deadline is 31-Jan-2014.
>
>
>
> Thanks again to Tim and Chris for taking the lead on this.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Steve DelBianco
>
> Vice chair for policy coordination
>
>
>
>
>
>
>