Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic plan

[Aparna Sridhar <aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Chris,

The original draft was the one that struck references to the public
interest in the vision statement and noted that public interest "will be
another layer for the community/staff to remember and adhere to."  This is
one example but there are a couple others. I am not sure restoring these
points, which express skepticism about ICANN's public interest mission,
would help address David's concerns.

As I said, I was trying to make some edits for clarity, but I think what
you and David are suggesting is an openness to new content.  While I could
take a crack at that, I think that it would be better coming from either
David or you.  I don't want to misrepresent what either of you is thinking.

Cheers,

Aparna Sridhar
Counsel
Google Inc.
1101 New York Avenue N.W.
Second Floor
Washington, DC 20005
tel:  202.346.1261
e-mail: aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Chris Chaplow <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Members,
>
>
>
> Thanks Aparna for making updates to the document.
>
>
>
> I am fine to accept the changes and in particular for the sections that I
> authored. I would ask that Tim Cheng,  Andrew Mack and Martin Sutton also
> advise of their respective sections.
>
>
>
> David,  I am not aware of any existing BC position on the issue or scope
> of Public interest.    Your suggestion  that we recognize that public
> interest issues within the context of ICANN’s mandate are within its
> purview, seems a reasonable approach.
>
>
>
> If Aparna can restore the public interest points within this, and post
> back to the list, it would be a step forward.
>
>
>
> We need to submit the final version on the 31st January.
>
>
>
> Many thanks for contributing.
>
>
>
>  best
>
>
>
> *Chris Chaplow*
> *Managing Director*
> *Andalucia.com S.L.*
> Avenida del Carmen 9
> Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
> 1ª Planta, Oficina 30
> Estepona, 29680
> Malaga, Spain
> *Tel: + (34) 952 897 865 <%2B%20%2834%29%20952%20897%20865>*
> *Fax: + (34) 952 897 874 <%2B%20%2834%29%20952%20897%20874>*
> E-mail: *chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx* <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Web: *www.andalucia.com* <http://www.andalucia.com/>
> *Information about Andalucia, Spain.*
>
>
>
> *De:* owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] *En nombre
> de *Aparna Sridhar
>
> *Enviado el:* lunes, 27 de enero de 2014 19:13
> *Para:* Marilyn Cade
> *CC:* Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO list; Chen, Tim; Chris at Andalucia
> *Asunto:* Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for
> 5-year strategic plan
>
>
>
> All--
>
>
>
> Please see some suggested edits from Google on the attached document.
>  While there is some amount of reorganizing, I believe our suggested edits
> preserve the points made in the original document while making some
> improvements for flow and clarity.  I have also suggested deviation from
> ICANN's proposed submission form where adhering to it obscured the content
> of our comments.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aparna
>
>
>  Aparna Sridhar
>
> Counsel
>
> Google Inc.
>
> 1101 New York Avenue N.W.
>
> Second Floor
>
> Washington, DC 20005
>
> tel:  202.346.1261
>
> e-mail: aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I will draft something for ICANN mission/lingage to I-GOV. I wanted to
> hear from CCWG and 1NET first, and that happened this week.
>
>
>
> I also moved this to bc-private just temporarily.
>
>
>
> David, Aparna, Philip, and I were on CCWG and David, Aparna, and others
> from business COMMUNITY, were on relevant calls last week. I will send a
> short assessment over week end.
>
>
>
> If members want public access to our discussions, we can move back to
> public list, but I didn't want to do that, without full consideration from
> BC members.
>
>
>
> M
> ------------------------------
>
> From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> CC: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year
> strategic plan
> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:27:45 +0000
>
>
>
> Attached is the current draft BC comment on ICANN’s Vision, Mission &
> Focus for 5-year Strategic Plan, which came out of last summer’s
> "brainstorming" by board, community and staff. 
> (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/focus-areas-29oct13-en.pdf>
> )
>
>
>
> Tim Chen and Chris Chaplow led drafting of the BC comment, with help from
> Martin Sutton, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.
>
>
>
> Comments close 31-Jan, so today begins our 14-day review period.
>
>
>
> We need draft comments for Focus Area V: Defining role clarity for ICANN
> in the Internet governance ecosystem.
>
> Yesterday I shared my views about ICANN limiting its mission and avoiding
> entanglements in the broader I-Gov debate.       If no BC members
> contribute text for Area V, then I can draft something next week.
>
>
>
> Please REPLY ALL with edits (TRACK CHANGES)as soon as possible, since the
> comment deadline is 31-Jan-2014.
>
>
>
> Thanks again to Tim and Chris for taking the lead on this.
>
>
>
> —
>
> Steve DelBianco
>
> Vice chair for policy coordination
>
>
>
>
>
>
>