Re: [dssa] please review: a summary of the "threat events" conversation on the call yesterday
- To: dssa@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [dssa] please review: a summary of the "threat events" conversation on the call yesterday
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:36:20 -0600
Joerg and all,
yep -- i'm starting to figure out a way to approach those next dimensions.
we'll spend a call or two really educating ourselves about what the methodology
wants to do, and then we'll tailor the methodology based on our needs. in a
perfect world, we would have done this before we started the working group --
but we're building the airplane while we're flying it. now that we have gone
through this once, i think it's going to be easier going forward.
the other thing that will help is that we have a lot of work already done on
Vulnerabilities that we can draw into the discussion. :-)
On Feb 24, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Jörg Schweiger wrote:
> Mikey, all,
> I think our discussion has been covered perfectly. Thanks Mikey.
> However, what is newly stated ("Dimensions of the analysis" - paragraph)
> will - to my point of view - still need some overlooking in its
> definition, in particular for example "Adverse impact" and
> Best regards
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)