Re: [dssa] please review: a summary of the "threat events" conversation on the call yesterday

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Joerg and all,

yep -- i'm starting to figure out a way to approach those next dimensions.  
we'll spend a call or two really educating ourselves about what the methodology 
wants to do, and then we'll tailor the methodology based on our needs.  in a 
perfect world, we would have done this before we started the working group -- 
but we're building the airplane while we're flying it.  now that we have gone 
through this once, i think it's going to be easier going forward.

the other thing that will help is that we have a lot of work already done on 
Vulnerabilities that we can draw into the discussion.  :-)

mikey


On Feb 24, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Jörg Schweiger wrote:

> Mikey, all,
> 
> I think our discussion has been covered perfectly. Thanks Mikey.
> However, what is newly stated ("Dimensions of the analysis" - paragraph) 
> will - to my point of view - still need some overlooking in its 
> definition, in particular for example "Adverse impact" and 
> Vulnerabilities.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Joerg

[snip]

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)