<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Domain tasting
- To: <dt-motion-21may08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Domain tasting
- From: "Jon A. Pastor" <jp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 15:08:42 -0400
I think that there is a far more serious and insidious problem, of which domain
tasting is the tip of the iceberg.
There is a company called Chesterton Holdings that buys domains based on
"eavesdropping" on inquiries for availability: I was the victim of this in the
past week. I searched my son's name, richardpastor, and found that
richardpastor.com was available. When I returned yesterday to purchase it, I
found that it had been registered by NAMEKING.COM, which is related to
Chesterton Holdings.
Please take a look at
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Whois-Hijacking-My-Domain-Research/ for an
article on this practice.
I have contacted NAMEKING.COM and told them that they are in violation of
ICANN's policies, but the real issue is that ICANN continues to certify them!
Companies who violate not only the spirit but the letter of ICANN's policies
should be forced to cease and desist on pain of revocation of their
certification.
I certainly support any effort to discourage tasting, but I think that ICANN
should take action against a practice -- domain snooping and theft -- that is
widely practiced and well-known to be occurring.
There should, among other things, be a way of searching for a domain's
availability that is invisible to third parties: not providing this service is
begging for abuses like those committed by Chesterton Holdings and NAMEKING.
-Jon A. Pastor
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|