RE : [gnso-acc-sgb] ESA proposal for sub-group (b) of Whois Working Group

[Yaovi Atohoun <yaovito@xxxxxxxx>]

Dear Michael,
   
  If I understand the Task Force Recommendation and the Working Group 
Bacgrounder document,   the Whois will continue to publish a limited data 
concerning each Registered Name. So I don't think really necessary for some of 
your listed third parties to access the complete record.  They are:
   
  
  
  
  (2) determining availability of domain names;
  
  
  
  (6) contributing to user confidence in Internet by helping users identify 
persons or entities responsible for online content and services;
   
  Could you please help me to better understand why these two categories?
   
  Thanks
  Yaovi Atohoun


Michael Warnecke <mwarnecke@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :        Dear sub-group (b),
   
  I would like to submit the attached proposal for consideration.  
   
  The Whois system serves as a vital tool in our efforts, and those of our 
members, to combat online piracy.  It is our strong preference that the current 
system continue, without encumbering the Whois service with new restrictions 
that might compromise not only our own enforcement efforts but a variety of 
other legitimate purposes for which users routinely query the databases.
   
  Mindful, however, that the mandate of this working group is to address 
implementation issues surrounding OPoC, we offer the following proposal as an 
alternative approach in an effort to move the conversation forward.
   
  Cordially,
   
  Michael Warnecke

   
  ----------------------------------------------------
  Michael Warnecke
  Counsel, IP & Technology Policy
  Entertainment Software Association
  575 7th Street NW, Suite 300
  Washington DC 20004
  t: 202-223-2400 x.130
  f: 202-223-2401
  mwarnecke@xxxxxxxxxx
   


             
---------------------------------
 Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail