<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Report for tomorrow
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Report for tomorrow
- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:17:32 -0400
Thanks, Avri, sorry you can't be with us. I found two aspects of your
response ambiguous and hope you can clarify:
>>> Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> 5/23/2007 1:38 AM >>>
>I for one think that LEAs also need to go through
>due process in order to obtain the information they claim to
>require. I also assume I am n the minority on this as it stands.
Your "due process" view seems to be fully compatible with the idea that
LEAs categorically are recognized as a third party with a legitimate
claim to access.
>I agree on propositions b-d
Propositions c and d call for straw polls. Does your agreement only
mean that you think we should hold such straw polls, or are you
expressing an opinion on the issues? If is it the latter, I will need
more information, and since you can't be on the call it would be
appropriate to express your view via email on the list.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|